The proposed Technology Levy is described as a continuation of existing programs, but it is not a simple renewal. It represents a 77% increase over the prior technology levy. Voters should be informed that this measure asks for substantially more funding, not a simple renewal.
Over the past four years, widely used technology price indexes show that many core technology costs—such as student devices, networking equipment, and basic IT services—have remained flat or declined when adjusted for inflation. While some specific items experienced temporary price increases, overall technology cost inflation does not support an increase of this size.
The district states the levy will fund one-to-one student devices, classroom technology upgrades, digital curriculum, secure infrastructure, and support for special education students. These are the same general purposes cited in the previous technology levy. If these investments were already funded, why is a 77% increase now required?
Taxpayers are asked to approve dollar amounts, not goals. Before approving a large increase, voters deserve transparent reporting on prior promises, results achieved, and specific reasons current funding levels are no longer sufficient. Accountability to outcomes should accompany any request for significantly higher taxes.
Statement submitted by: Dominique France, JoAnn Tolentino, Lynda Schram, https://SchoolDataProject.com/districts.html