King County logo
v1.0.0.1
Shoreline School District No. 412

Proposition No. 2 
Replacement of Expiring Capital Levy for Technology Improvements and Support 

The Board of Directors of Shoreline School District No. 412 adopted Resolution No. 2021-15, concerning a proposition to finance technology improvements and support. This proposition would authorize the District to acquire and install instructional technology equipment and infrastructure throughout School District facilities to improve student learning and provide related training and support, and levy the following excess taxes, in place of an expiring levy, on all taxable property within the District: 
 

Collection Year

Estimated Levy

Rate/$1,000

Assessed Value

Levy Amount

2023

$0.20

$3,500,000
2024 $0.19 $3,500,000
2025 $0.18 $3,500,000
2026 $0.16 $3,500,000


all as provided in Resolution No. 2021-15. Should this proposition be approved?

Yes

No


Passage of Proposition No. 2 would allow Shoreline Public Schools to replace an existing capital levy for technology improvements and support that will expire at the end of calendar year 2022.  The taxes collected by this replacement levy will be used to acquire and install instructional technology equipment and infrastructure throughout School District facilities to improve student learning and provide related training and support.  Further information is available on the District’s website at https://www.shorelineschools.org/.
 

The proposed four-year replacement capital levy for technology improvements and support would authorize collection of taxes to provide $3,500,000 each year from 2023 through 2026.  The tax levy rate required to produce these levy amounts is estimated to be $0.20 in 2023, $0.19 in 2024, $0.18 in 2025, and $0.16 in 2026 (estimated levy rate per $1,000 of assessed value).  Exemptions from taxes may be available to certain homeowners.  For more information, call the King County Department of Assessments, 206.296.3920.

No statement submitted.

Statements in favor of and in opposition to a ballot measure are submitted by committees appointed by the jurisdiction. No persons came forward to serve on the committee and to write a statement in favor. If you would like to be involved with a committee in the future please contact the jurisdiction.

These cap levy items should come out of the General Fund. If salaries were not so bloated this would be possible.

 

These levies should be rejected. There should be no tax measures whatsoever on the ballot in February. February is the lowest voter turnout election of the year. Understandably. Most citizens are just learning that there are levies to vote on - again. We just had the holidays. Citizens have voting fatigue. And, importantly, citizens won't even receive their property tax bills for the year until a month later in March. How convenient.

 

In the interest of high voter participation, these important, large tax measures (which affect all property owners and renters in their rents) should be only on the November Election. It is irresponsible for the district to propose property tax measures a month before voters see their property tax bills.

 

The state will never be able to fulfill its constitutional obligation of fully-funding schools so long as local districts are allowed to spend more than the ample provision the state provides. Until that changes, citizens need to reject these local levies like the ones before you today. More details at www.schooldataproject.com


Submitted by: Jeff Heckathorn, info@schooldataproject.com

Simple majority (Wash. Const. art. VII, sec. 2(a))

For questions about this measure, contact: Marla S. Miller, Deputy Superintendent, (206) 393-4514, marla.miller@shorelineschools.org

30 en-US Production

TTY: Relay 711

Sign up for email or text notifications